Consolidated client feedback · internal · for Amar

Real Contest feedback + March 2026 client & IB survey

Two datasets in one backlog. The Glasgow Challenge real-money contest as 56 community members actually experienced it in July, and the March 2026 survey of 624 clients and 43 IB partners. Every quote verified against source.

Telegram messages
330,045 parsed
Contest window
20–26 Jul GMT+8
Members discussing
56
Survey responses
667 624 + 43
Survey themes
36 crypto excluded
Jira
1 task 31 optional

Verdict

Overall satisfaction is high, and it is high for a specific reason. Traders get capital in their hands whether they win or lose, so participating is never a dead loss. That generosity is why people stay, and it is why they extend patience through execution problems instead of leaving. 89% of clients score ROBO 9–10 on NPS and IB support averages 9.1/10. The brand is not the problem. The plumbing is, and both datasets say so from different angles: the platform and the partner infrastructure have not kept pace with the goodwill.

Contest (July, Telegram): net mixed. Positive on the payout, negative on the mechanics. Roughly 50 distinct members raised a complaint or an unanswered rules question against ~28 who posted something positive, with heavy overlap. The people who won and thanked the admin filed the loudest fairness complaints, so this is engaged-user friction, not churn-risk hostility. The core defect is that the 25% drawdown cap was enforced only by manual review after the contest closed, so the live leaderboard was never the ranking.

Survey (March): four issues surfaced independently in both the client and IB datasets. When 624 clients and 43 IBs flag the same problems without prompting, that is not feedback, it is a mandate: server stability during news, gold spreads, minimum deposit, and consistent deposit bonuses.

The two datasets agree on one thing in particular. The survey asked for more frequent contests (212 votes) and for trader-facing drawdown tooling (257 clients name risk management as a barrier). The July contest data shows both work, and shows exactly how they fail when the reason for a pause is hidden from the trader. Fix the transparency defects before increasing contest cadence.

~50 members complained
~28 positive
Read the 31 tickets below as refinement, not rescue. Members are not asking to be compensated for a broken product. They are asking a product they already trust to be legible. Every complaint in this document was filed by someone who stayed.

Why people stay

the thing the defect list cannot show you

The backlog below is long, and read cold it looks worse than the reality. The retention driver is that capital gets put in traders' hands whether they win or lose, and the community knows it. That generosity is what buys the patience visible in every thread.

What it buysEvidenceWho / when
Win or lose, you get something "Gagal. Buat acc baru" → "Tak gagal. Ada hadiah 30usd""Failed. Making a new account." → "Not a failure. There's a $30 prize." — a peer talking another member off the ledge using the consolation structure, unprompted Si PumKinS → Paih
07-21 11:41–11:43
The payout breadth is the point 16 ladder winners took USD 3,000. On top of that: $30 saguhati to every qualified non-winner, $50 to those who were originally top-16 but busted the DD cap, and ~27 Pick'em winners at $30. The contest paid roughly three times as many people as it ranked.Announced structure, 27 July 09:53 Settlement post
Loyalty survives a hard no "Tak apa lah tak ada rezeki dah" … "Terima kasih roboforex since 2020 🤝""Never mind, no luck for me." … "Thank you RoboForex, since 2020.""Baik. Saya terima dengan redha 🥹. Terima kasih robo kerana bagi bonus since 2020. Gerak lu gengg.""Alright. I accept it with grace. Thank you Robo for giving bonuses since 2020. Moving on, gang." — posted after support told him he was permanently ineligible for every bonus type H
07-20 22:58
and 07-21 19:05
Generosity is the stated reason "Admin tak pernah kedekut ❤️""Admin is never stingy.""Dpt le 30usd..jdi le tmbh modal😂""Got $30, good enough to add to my capital." 🌵Cactus🌵 07-27 15:53
ᴍɪsᴢ sɪʟᴇɴᴛ Kɪʟʟᴇʀ 07-27 07:22
Money actually arrives "Dh masuk bank dh 50usd wd td. Mantap ah cmni""The $50 withdrawal already hit my bank. Superb like this." Impulse Pips Hunter
07-20 14:08
Survey agrees 89% of clients score 9–10 on NPS. IB support averages 9.1/10. The source deck's own words: "Traders love the withdrawal speed, bonus culture, and community. This is a genuine competitive moat." March 2026
667 responses

February → July: the app the complaints are measured against

Worth stating plainly, because it changes how the defect list should be read. The Mini App launched on 9 February 2026. This is what members were reporting then, versus what they were reporting in July.

February 2026 — launch monthJuly 2026 — the contest week
"Kosong je" · "Loading weh" · "Loading lagi ke"Just blank · Loading, man · Still loading? — launch morning, 09-02 10:43–11:08 "Byk improved dh apps cuma takde gif tu sedih sikit sbb sy suka gif"The app has improved a lot, just a bit sad there's no GIF because I like GIFs — Tengku Dompet Tebal, 18-07 14:57
"kenapa kosong ya, smalam 92point" · "91point apps kosong" · "point jadi kosong"Why is it empty, yesterday I had 92 points · 91 points, app shows zero · points went to zero — Zhu and BERONA KOKNA, recurring 10-02 to 23-02 "Admin memang baca je la ni kan semua kat sini, terus ada semula gif. Love laa😘 tak sempat nak sedih lama2"The admin really does read everything here, the GIF came straight back. Love it. Didn't even get time to stay sad — 19-07 10:32, under 20 hours after the complaint
"Ni bug kena tangkap nie" · "Berlumba post link tu.. Laju sebelum bug di tangkap" · "Patut la sy tgk point kmu makin bertambah padahal ada daily max point. Rupanya ada bug"This bug needs catching · Everyone racing to post links, quick before the bug gets caught · No wonder your points kept climbing despite a daily cap. Turns out there's a bug — 🌵Cactus🌵, 23-02, a referral exploit being farmed in the open No points-integrity exploit reported in the July window. The equivalent complaint is that the leaderboard shows an ineligible entry, which is a transparency defect on top of a working ledger.
"Wheel spin rosak kot"The wheel spin is probably broken — Zarul Shanks, 20-02 10:06 Wheel ran with a jackpot tier, weekly caps and per-user limits. Complaints in July were about eligibility rules, not the wheel failing.
"Sbb hari ni baru launch.. Bagi masa sikot admin tgk2/cari bug ke cacing ke ulat dlm app"Because it only launched today. Give the admin a bit of time to hunt for bugs or worms or caterpillars in the app — 🌵Cactus🌵, 09-02 21:48 "Miniapp ni dibina utk long term engagement... Makin lama nanti, makin byk la bonus2 dan benefit akan ditambah dlm app"This mini app is built for long-term engagement... Over time more bonuses and benefits will be added — 🌵Cactus🌵, 18-02, the community articulating the roadmap themselves
Five months moved the complaint from "the app shows zero" to "the GIF is missing". That is the trajectory the July defect list sits on. The community grants patience because they have watched things get fixed: the same member who complained about a missing GIF had it back the next morning and said so publicly. Treat GT-1 through GT-12 as the next increment of that, not as a verdict on the product.

Contest: the published rules contradicted each other

root cause of most confusion below

Four official surfaces published materially different qualification thresholds and prize pools for the same contest, inside 48 hours.

SurfaceWhenMin tradesROI floorDD capWinnersPrize pool
Gold Traders bot07-18 12:0210 / 4 days20%25%
Gold Traders bot07-19 12:02top 30$4,120 → $5,050+
Colonel Misai bot07-19 16:005bal ≥ $12015$3,000
Activities announcement07-20 02:2710 / 4 days5%25%top 30$7,000+
Actual settlement07-27 09:5316$3,000
Members noticed and stopped trusting the T&C. "@naimkatiman tnc ni confirm dah last tukar ke... 👀❓❓❓" Is this T&C confirmed as the last change? — 🇸🇭🇴🇲🇪🇽, 07-19 10:28 "Mau kjap lgi 25% DD jdi 10% kang" Give it a moment and the 25% DD becomes 10% — Si PumKinS, 07-23 19:26
In fairness: the biggest change was made in the traders' favour. The ROI floor moving from 20% to 5% was deliberate and generous, and the admin said so in-channel four minutes after being asked: "Nanti kita umum dalam poster hari ni and esok. Itu sepatutnya final tu. Kita kurang kan min profit 5%, untuk dapat prize" We'll announce it in a poster today and tomorrow. That should be the final one. We lowered the minimum profit to 5% so people can get the prize. — R - Naim IT, 07-19 10:33 The defect is not that the bar was lowered. It is that four surfaces kept serving the old number afterwards, so a concession to traders read to them as instability.

Contest: what went wrong

ordered by severity × volume
#ThemeWhat they saidWho / whenVoices
1Leaderboard ranks ineligible entries "Nak tanya saya rank 1 tp DD 53% mcm mana ek"I'm rank 1 but my DD is 53%, how does that work?"Kenapa DD lebih 25% ada dalam ranking leaderboard tu. Kata tak boleh lebih 25% DD"Why is DD over 25% in that leaderboard ranking? It was said DD cannot exceed 25% Wari 07-21 11:12

🤡 07-26 16:10
10
2"Under review" with no reason "@naimkatiman Kenapa under review dd tk sampai 10% lg"Why am I under review, my DD hasn't even reached 10%"Hari depo lg profit 26% DD 15% knape under review😄"Today deposited again, profit 26%, DD 15%, why under review — matches the 25% ROI gain cap exactly FighterUsd88 07-21 18:18

Wari 07-24 16:03
9
325% DD cap too tight for gold "Ramainya yang dd 25% 😭 kita mc"So many hit 25% dd, we got margin called — day one, 10 hours in"Susah nak kawal dd ngan gold ni"Hard to control drawdown with this gold scientist part time
07-20 22:24

Majima Goro 07-20 22:31
9
4Entries vanish from the leaderboard "boleh tolong checkkan kenapa sy tiba2 xde dlm leaderbod? Sebelum ni ada... Try jgk trade td, tggu 15min pun takde..."Can you check why I suddenly disappeared from the leaderboard? I was there before. I even traded and waited 15 min Ieja 07-22 18:307
5"4 trading days" read as an entry cutoff "spatot khamis last join..yg join hari ni..memag out la..sbb rules 4 hari kene ade entry"Thursday should have been the last day to join, whoever joins today is definitely out, because of the 4-day rule"Rules 10 close trade / Takyah 4 hari"The rule is 10 closed trades, no need for 4 days — corrected by a member, not staff xAnGaHx 07-24 16:12

Majima Goro 07-24 16:17
7
6DD cap undefined to the decimal "dikira 24.99% masih boleh la kan? ngam 25.01% kira fail dh kan?"24.99% still passes right? And exactly 25.01% counts as a fail?"25 kira bawah.. Admin kan tak strict sgt.."25 counts as under, the admin isn't that strict anyway — the room settling on an invented rule Thor Lord of Gold
07-24 16:14

🌵Cactus🌵 07-24 16:49
6
7Paid Pick'em picks destroyed "Rosak tekaan" · "Kena bayar 50 points" · "Dah jadi kosong" "Smua tgh review"My picks are ruined · Have to pay 50 points · It's become empty, everyone is under review"Haiyaaa hilang abis" · "Makan point pulak😂"All gone · And it ate my points too Majima Goro
07-21 17:17–17:26

AkuQ88 07-21 16:57
6
827-min demand for a ruling, no human replied "@naimkatiman kasi jawapan" · "Sebab melibatkan real money kne adil" · "Kami betol2 nak kepastian"Give us an answer · Because it involves real money it has to be fair · We really want certainty"Kalau admin bgi tahu..senag saya nak bgi tahu awak..mslahnye..xde yg bgi tahu😂"If the admin told us it'd be easy for me to tell you. The problem is nobody tells us. FighterUsd88, xAnGaHx
07-24 16:20–16:47
2 days pre-settlement
6
9Pick'em cost vs zero return "Adu tk dpt 30usd. Melayang 300pts"Didn't get the $30. 300 points gone. AIZAT Farhan 07-27 13:154
10Consolation winners not listed "Dapat tu 30usd tapi dia tak senarai kan. Terpinggir" · "Atau tutup aib 🙈"They do get the $30 but they aren't listed. Sidelined · Or covering the shame 🤡 07-27 13:234
11Multi-account loophole, openly discussed "contoh acc 1 , dah mc or dd lebih 25,then masukkan acc 2 & 3 dua2 dapat stat + ranking cantik"Example: acc 1 is margin-called or DD over 25, then I enter acc 2 and 3 and both get nice stats and ranking DeepBlueMind 07-20 11:344
12Discouragement, intent to skip "Dh x semangat nk entry kalau mcm ni" · "Penat nk jaga drawdown mcm trade prop dah😂"I've lost the motivation to enter trades if it's like this · Tired of protecting drawdown, it's like a prop firm xAnGaHx 07-21 16:50
FighterUsd88 07-21 18:28
4
13Payout timing pressure "Bila nak masuk bonus boss? Nak wd modal kt acc contest tu nak byr duit rumah ni."When will the bonus come in, boss? I want to withdraw the capital in that contest account to pay my house payment. -ipinbiha- 07-27 12:423
14Moderation bot deflects rules questions "kalau DD macam ni masih layak ke geng?" → bot: "Siapa yang suruh awak tanya soalan yang awak sendiri dah tahu jawapannya?" → "kepastian je misai."With a DD like this am I still eligible? → Who told you to ask a question you already know the answer to? → I just want certainty, Misai. Fel FM 07-22 20:043
15Rule changed mid-flight, no notice "Kenapa tukar2 mase kontest tgh berjalan?" · "Kalau inform xpe lagi"Why change things while the contest is running? · If you informed us it would still be fine — refunded in 28 min xAnGaHx 07-20 18:483
Counterweight worth keeping. The drawdown cap is doing real pedagogical work and members said so unprompted: "Padahal tangan dh gigil nk tekan..tapi sbb kene jaga dd...jadi relex2 je tekan..tibe2 jadi displin😂" My hand was shaking wanting to click, but because I had to protect my DD I clicked calmly. Suddenly I became disciplined. — xAnGaHx, 07-21 12:53 A second member benchmarked it favourably: "25percent ni OK sgt ni..cuba trade prop yg cuma 3% je". Do not simply loosen the cap; fix the visibility.

March 2026 survey: four priorities validated by both audiences

624 clients + 43 IBs

These appeared independently in both datasets, which makes them the highest-confidence items in the whole backlog. Originally five; the crypto priority has been removed per scope note above.

#PriorityClient view (624)IB view (43)Recommended action
01Fix server stability during news events
infrastructure
89 server mentions + 96 news-volatility mentions. Charts freeze during NFP/FOMC. Traders can't close positions when they need to most. Top "fix one thing" response. Server crashes cause client account blowups, which become the IB's retention problem. Upgrade capacity to 3x peak load. Add regional servers. Publish a real-time status page.
02Lower gold spreads to competitive benchmarks
pricing
133 mentions and the #1 motivation factor at 385 votes. 96% of traders are on gold and benchmark you daily. 19% cite spread conditions as why clients leave. IBs can't credibly promote ROBO when spreads are visibly wider. Audit gold spreads vs top 5 competitors. Tighter tiers for volume traders. Publish a live comparison.
03Lower minimum deposit to $10–20 / RM20
acquisition
Current RM60 minimum cited as a barrier. 64% already trade micro lots. The base wants a lower entry. 49% say clients hesitate due to low capital. The #1 conversion killer for the entire IB funnel. Reduce to $10/RM20. Create a Starter Account tier. Integrate Touch 'n Go and GrabPay.
04Run consistent deposit bonus campaigns
growth
143 mentions, the highest raw count. Monthly 50–100% bonuses, especially tied to festivals, not cancelled on withdrawal. Bonuses are their best acquisition hook. One recalled being most active "when Robo started promote their no deposit bonus." Monthly deposit bonus with modest caps. Festival calendar. Revive the no-deposit bonus for acquisition.

What moves clients, and what stops them

Would motivate more tradingCount%Bar
Lower spreads on my favourite pairs38562%
Better market signals / alerts30148%
Cashback on volume25140%
Trading competitions with prizes21234%
More educational content14924%
More instrument variety498%
Why they don't trade moreCount%Bar
Waiting for better setups41266%
Risk management concerns25741%
Uncertain about market direction20433%
Not enough time to analyse11318%
Already trading at desired frequency6711%
Platform limitations152%
Read those two tables together. Only 2% of clients blame platform limitations for trading less, yet server stability is the #1 cross-validated complaint. The platform problem is not suppressing volume across the base, it is damaging the active high-value cohort at the worst possible moment. Meanwhile 66% are simply waiting for setups, which is a signals and education problem (RB-9, RB-11), not a pricing one.

IB partner network

43 responses
Biggest struggleCount%Why clients hesitate to deposit (IB view)%
Getting new clients2763%Low capital49%
Keeping clients active2251%Market conditions23%
Converting sign-ups to deposit819%Fear of scam9%
Marketing content creation819%Poor follow-up from IB7%
Payment issues614%Payment method issues5%
Competition pressure614%
58% of IBs bring 0–2 clients a month and 71% of depositors churn. With that shape, retention tooling (RB-6, RB-15) returns more than acquisition spend. 37% of IBs cannot even explain how their own commission is calculated.

All 36 survey themes

deduplicated from 667 responses · 2 crypto themes removed
#CategoryFeedbackSourceMentionsPriority
1Deposit BonusIntroduce regular deposit bonus (50-100%) that supports margin/floating. Competitors like XM offer this consistently.Both100+Critical
3Platform StabilityMT4/MT5 server frequently lags, freezes, or disconnects during high-impact news events (NFP, CPI, FOMC). Traders unable to open/close positions.Both50+Critical
4Platform StabilitySlippage is too high during volatile sessions. Orders not executed at expected prices, affecting scalpers and EA users.Both30+Critical
5SpreadSpreads widen excessively during high-impact news. Need more stable/fixed spreads especially on XAUUSD.Both80+Critical
6BonusesMore festive/seasonal bonuses (Hari Raya, CNY, Christmas, Merdeka) that are not cancelled upon withdrawal.Client30+High
7BonusesBring back No Deposit Bonus (NDB) to attract new traders and give beginners risk-free experience.Both20+High
8ContestsMore frequent trading competitions (demo and live) with attractive prizes. Monthly or quarterly contests keep traders engaged.Both25+High
9EducationProvide more structured trading education: beginner guides, webinars, strategy tutorials, and risk management courses.Both30+High
10ExecutionOrder execution speed needs improvement. Faster execution needed for scalping and automated trading strategies.Client25+High
11IB CommissionHigher and more competitive IB commission rates. Flexible rebate structures to help IBs reinvest in client acquisition.IB15+High
12IB DashboardIB partner dashboard needs real-time tracking of client activity, deposits, withdrawals, trade details, and commission analytics.IB10+High
14InstrumentsAdd more indices (US30, NAS100, S&P500, DAX, FTSE) and make them available on Cent accounts.Both15+High
15RegulationPursue Tier-1 regulatory licenses (FCA, ASIC, CySEC, or Malaysia SC/BNM) to build stronger trust and credibility.Client5+High
16SpreadOverall spreads on Gold (XAUUSD) need to be more competitive compared to other brokers.Client40+High
17Website/UIWebsite cabinet/dashboard is complicated and outdated. Needs modern, cleaner, more intuitive interface.Both15+High
18Withdrawal FeesRemove or reduce withdrawal fees. Increase free withdrawal days beyond just specific Tuesdays. At least 2-3 days per week.Both30+High
19AI/AnalyticsIntegrate AI-powered trading assistant, market analysis, and personalized trading insights into the platform.Client15+Medium
20Cent AccountRestore 0.01 minimum lot size on cent accounts for all users. Add MT5 cent account option.Client10+Medium
21Copy TradingImprove copy trading transparency: show drawdown history, risk scores, strategy age. Allow copy trading from small capital (USD 20 cent account).Client10+Medium
22DepositLower minimum deposit further (USD 5-10). Add more local payment methods including e-wallets (TNG) and local bank options.Client10+Medium
23DepositOffer local currency accounts (MYR) to avoid hidden conversion fees on every deposit/withdrawal.Client5+Medium
24EducationPublish regular market analysis and educational content specifically for Gold (XAUUSD) traders.Client10+Medium
25IB FairnessEnsure all IBs have equal commission tiers and privileges. Some IB links have different conditions creating unfair competition.IB5+Medium
26IB MarketingProvide marketing support, promotional materials, and co-branded content to help IBs acquire new clients.IB10+Medium
27IB RebateCredit IB self-rebate to wallet instead of trading account. Faster rebate/commission payouts.IB5+Medium
28InstrumentsAdd more global stocks, ETFs, futures, options, and commodities (Oil/WTI/Brent) to diversify offerings.Client15+Medium
29KYCSpeed up KYC verification process. Bank card verification is sometimes difficult.Both5+Medium
30LoyaltyCreate loyalty/rewards program for long-term traders. Points per lot traded, tier-based benefits, cashback for high-volume.Client15+Medium
31MarketingIncrease social media presence (TikTok, Facebook). Use influencer marketing and live trading sessions to attract new traders.Both10+Medium
32Mobile AppImprove mobile trading app with better charting tools, faster performance, and more responsive design.Client10+Medium
33Risk ToolsAdd advanced risk management tools: customizable drawdown limits, revenge trading detection, auto-pause during news.Client10+Medium
34TradingViewEnable direct trading from TradingView integration for a better charting experience.Client5+Medium
35TransparencyShow full trading cost breakdown (spread + commission + swap) before order confirmation. More transparent execution reporting.Client10+Medium
36Withdrawal SpeedSome withdrawals occasionally delayed. Weekend withdrawals should be faster or available.Client15+Medium
37CommunityOrganize annual client gatherings/gala dinners (not just IB events). Build stronger trader community offline.Client5+Low
38LeverageIncrease maximum leverage to 1:2000 or 1:3000 to attract traders who prefer higher leverage.Client5+Low

Numbering follows the source workbook. Rows 2 and 13 are absent because they were the crypto themes.

Optional breakdown

Only needed if the single task gets split. That task is collapsed at the foot of this page. Same content at ticket granularity: 12 contest tickets and 19 survey tickets, each traceable to a numbered section of the single task. Every ticket below is formatted in Jira wiki markup. Copy for Jira puts the whole ticket on your clipboard, ready to paste into a description field. Download CSV gives you a bulk-import file with Summary, Issue Type, Priority, Labels and Description columns.

Framing for whoever picks these up. The single task at the foot of this page is the primary hand-off; this list exists so nobody has to re-derive it. 31 tickets is a refinement backlog on a product people already like, not a triage list for a failing one. Overall satisfaction is high because traders receive capital whether they win or lose, so nobody here is asking to be made whole. They are asking for the rules to be legible and the state to be visible. Five months ago the complaint was that the app showed a blank screen and zeroed points; in July it was a missing GIF, fixed overnight. These tickets are the next increment on that line.
CSV: 1 task + 31 Plain text
Scope note. All cryptocurrency items have been deliberately removed at request, not overlooked. That means the shared priority "03 Restore crypto trading with weekend hours [PRODUCT]" (226 client votes, 71 mentions, and named by IBs as a retention loss), plus survey themes 2 and 13 (bring back BTC/ETH/XRP/DOGE; add BTCUSD to Cent accounts). The five cross-validated priorities are therefore presented as four, and the 38-theme table as 36. Original counts are preserved everywhere else so the arithmetic still reconciles against the source files.

The source files were cleaned to match. The March workbook and report now carry the same exclusion, so nothing you forward disagrees with anything else here. The originals in Downloads were left untouched. Priorities renumbered 01–04, theme rows 2 and 13 deleted with source numbering kept so the gaps stay visible, and a one-line scope statement added inside each file. Excel, crypto removed Word report, crypto removed
Jira hand-off, collapsed Real contest feedback, additional feedback from last March 2026 survey The hand-off for Amar. Real contest feedback is the subject; the March survey rides along as context. Click to open.

The single ticket to send Amar. Copy description gives you the short version shown below, about 2,200 characters, which links back to this page for everything else. Four headings: verdict, root cause, the six-item ask, and the March survey flagged as context rather than as work. Real contest only in the ask.

Short by design, and the link does the rest. Amar can act on the description without opening anything: what the mood was, what caused it, what to fix and in what order. The quotes, the confirmed rule table, the drift evidence and the reconciliation of every apparently conflicting number stay here, one click away. If Jira should hold the whole write-up instead of linking to it, Copy long version gives the nine-section text, and the 31-ticket breakdown above is the same content again at ticket granularity. Use one of the three, not several.